Sorry, I was probably a bit too quick there.

Just to give some context: this year alone I have already removed 156 stickers from the catalog because they were redundant or showed no visible difference to me. That is about 75 per month. Maintaining the catalog takes quite a lot of time, and mistakes can happen on my side - please accept my apologies for that.

In my view, skipping quality control would not really help us, because labels are sometimes redundant or uploaded to the wrong catalog entry. On the other hand, it would also take even more time if I had to discuss every doubtful sticker individually. So I am still a bit unsure what the right balance should be.

What would help me a lot is a short comment whenever the differences are small. It would also help if the images were uploaded in the size of 300 × 405 pixels at 300 dpi. In that format, size differences in particular become much easier to recognize.

Would it be possible to upload the images again in that format?

The erased SCB labels were very different in size from the others and were well marked.

I was away for a while and today reviewed many of the new entries. I always enjoy seeing them - that part never changes. However, I do delete some again if, on my screen, the difference from existing entries is not clearly recognizable.

Of course, I may be mistaken. In this case today, I spotted the dot on the “i” at the very last moment. So please make use of the comment field if a new entry is particularly important to you. It really helps to understand what makes the difference.

Bigger letters for SCB